Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
James Kent Trotter vs Constantin Frantzen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trotter vs Frantzen analysis and find out who is favored!
James Kent Trotter vs Constantin Frantzen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trotter 1 - 0 Frantzen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trotter has won 50.36% of points on their second serve, while Frantzen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trotter, in recent form, has won 44.05% of their opponent's second serve points, while Frantzen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.14% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trotter has saved 63.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Frantzen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trotter has won 56.14% of matches played (W/L 32/ 25), with Frantzen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trotter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 20/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Frantzen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 28/ 22), where as Frantzen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trotter winning 1 times and Frantzen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Trotter winning 2 and Frantzen winning 0. The last match between Trotter and Frantzen was at the Columbus 2 Challenger, 18-09-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with James Kent Trotter getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:48:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trotter and Frantzen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trotter winning 0 times and Frantzen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trotter winning 0, and Frantzen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trotter has played against opponents with an average rank of 309.44 while Frantzen has played against players with an average rank of 183.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trotter has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Frantzen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trotter has converted 41.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Frantzen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
371
Rank
371
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
56% (62-48)
Career Total W/L
53% (34-30)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | James Kent Trotter | Constantin Frantzen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:48:21 | 0:48:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (24/35) | 58% (25/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 92% (22/24) | 60% (15/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (6/11) | 22% (4/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (24/43) | 20% (7/35) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
James Kent Trotter
Player
Constantin Frantzen
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
15
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | James Kent Trotter | Constantin Frantzen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (27/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (282/257) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.72 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 191 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:21 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 293.08 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (951/1638) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (731/951) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (346/687) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (48/115) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (539/1544) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 0% (0/0) |
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Alafia Ayeni
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
James Kent Trotter
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
4
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hiroki Moriya
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Constantin Frantzen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Constantin Frantzen
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roko Horvat
Player
Constantin Frantzen
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roy Smith
Player
Constantin Frantzen
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
13
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
43 of
54)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
14 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constantin Frantzen
Player
Omni Kumar
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
43%
(
41 of
96)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
106
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Constantin Frantzen
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Constantin Frantzen
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
15
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Constantin Frantzen
Player
Taym Alazmeh
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
11 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Constantin Frantzen
Player
Milan Welte
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Trotter Vs Frantzen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
